Attempts to control nuclear weapons

History · A Level: The nuclear arms race, 1945-1991 (exams to Nov 2026). The idea in plain words, the rules to remember, the mistake to avoid and a worked example, written and checked by Mega Lecture.

Test this topic freeAll History topics

The idea

After the Cuban crisis both superpowers accepted that the arms race needed rules. The first treaties limited testing and the spread of weapons to new states.

In the 1970s the SALT talks set ceilings on missile launchers and on defences against missiles. These agreements slowed the race but did not reverse it, because warheads were not limited and MIRVs let numbers keep rising. SALT II was signed but never ratified.

Real cuts came only when relations improved under Gorbachev. The INF Treaty removed a whole class of missiles and START reduced long-range weapons. Limits became reductions.

Rules to remember

Common mistake

Students confuse limiting with reducing. SALT only put ceilings on launchers, so arsenals still grew. The INF Treaty and START were the first to cut the number of weapons.

Worked example

A treaty froze the number of missile launchers but placed no limit on warheads. Why did this fail to stop the arms race?

  1. A launcher fires one missile, but a missile with MIRVs carries several warheads.
  2. Both sides could fit MIRVs to existing missiles without adding a single launcher.
  3. So the number of warheads rose sharply while the treaty was fully obeyed.

Answer: The freeze counted launchers, not warheads, so MIRVs allowed arsenals to keep growing. This was the main weakness of SALT I.

Ask about this

Type what you are stuck on. The helper finds the explanation, worked examples and the notes to read, free and instant.

Read the full notes

Keep going

← The impact of the arms race on US-Soviet relationsDétente and the outbreak of the Second Cold War →Take a History test