Realism and neorealism

International Relations · Theories of IR. The idea in plain words, the rules to remember, the mistake to avoid and a worked example, written and checked by Mega Lecture.

Test this topic freeAll International Relations topics

The idea

Realism sees world politics as a struggle for power among states. States are the main actors, they act rationally, and their first aim is survival. Realists doubt that law, morality or institutions can restrain them for long.

The setting is anarchy: there is no authority above states. Anarchy does not mean chaos. It means each state must look after itself, which is called self-help.

Realists disagree on the cause of power-seeking. Classical realists find it in human nature. Neorealists find it in the structure of the system. They also disagree on how much power states want: enough to be secure (Waltz) or as much as possible (Mearsheimer). When one state grows too strong, the others tend to form a balance of power against it.

Rules to remember

Common mistake

Students read 'anarchy' as disorder or constant war. In IR it only means that no central authority stands above states; order can still exist under anarchy.

Worked example

A state faces a rising neighbour. It raises its defence budget and introduces conscription, but signs no treaty with any other state. Which term describes this response?

  1. The state is resisting the stronger power, not joining it, so this is balancing and not bandwagoning.
  2. Balancing has two forms: internal (own strength) and external (alliances).
  3. The state uses only its own resources and makes no alliance.

Answer: Internal balancing.

Ask about this

Type what you are stuck on. The helper finds the explanation, worked examples and the notes to read, free and instant.

Read the full notes

Keep going

← Levels of analysis and foreign policy makingLiberalism, idealism and institutionalism →Take a International Relations test