Validity

Psychology AS · Research methodology. The idea in plain words, the rules to remember, the mistake to avoid and a worked example, written and checked by Mega Lecture.

Test this topic freeAll Psychology AS topics

The idea

Validity is about whether a study measures what it claims to measure, so that the findings are a true picture of the behaviour. A study is valid when the change in the dependent variable is caused by the independent variable and not by something else.

Ecological validity is how well the setting and task of a study reflect real life. Artificial tasks in a laboratory often have low ecological validity.

Several things threaten validity. Subjective measures depend on the researcher's interpretation, so they may be biased; objective measures avoid this. Demand characteristics are cues that reveal the aim, so participants change their behaviour. A small or narrow sample lowers generalisability, which is how far the findings apply to other people and settings.

Rules to remember

Common mistake

Students mix up validity and reliability. Validity is about accuracy (measuring the right thing); reliability is about consistency (getting the same result each time).

Worked example

A study of aggression gives participants a questionnaire with the title "How aggressive are you?" printed at the top. What is the threat to validity?

  1. The title tells participants what the study is measuring.
  2. Knowing the aim, they may give answers that make them look less aggressive.
  3. The scores then reflect what participants want to show, not their real aggression.

Answer: Demand characteristics, which lower the validity of the study.

Ask about this

Type what you are stuck on. The helper finds the explanation, worked examples and the notes to read, free and instant.

Keep going

← EthicsReliability and replicability →Take a Psychology AS test